Jump directly to the content
John Piper

preaching skill

Did Jesus Preach Paul's Gospel?

How the Gospel of Luke presents the gospel of justification by grace alone, through faith alone, on the basis of Christ's blood and righteousness alone, for the glory of God alone

Average Rating:  [see ratings/reviews]

1 of 9 |next | last

Editor's note: Now there's a provocative article title. It might sound like a heretical question, but think about. Does Paul ever strike you as having a gospel grounded more in grace than what Jesus preached? John Piper delivered the following message at the 2010 Together for the Gospel conference.

Did Jesus preach Paul's gospel?—the gospel of justification by grace alone, through faith alone, on the basis of Christ's blood and righteousness alone, for the glory of God alone.

What I am driven by in this message, and in much of my thinking since my days in graduate school in Germany, is the conviction that Jesus and Paul preached the same gospel. There is a 300-year history among critical scholars of claiming that Jesus' message and work was one thing, and what the early church made of it was another. Jesus brought the kingdom; it aborted; and the apostles substituted an institution, the church. And dozens of variations along this line.

Did Paul Get Jesus Right?

So the problem I am wrestling with is not whether evangelicalism gets Paul's gospel right, but whether Paul got Jesus' gospel right. Because I have a sense that among the reasons that some are losing a grip on the gospel today is not only the suspicion that we are forcing it into traditional doctrinal categories rather than biblical ones, but also that in our default to Pauline categories we are selling Jesus short. In other words, for some—perhaps many—there is the suspicion (or even conviction) that justification by faith alone is part of Paul's gospel, but not part of Jesus' gospel. And in feeling that way, our commitment to the doctrine is weakened, and we are thus less passionate to preach it and defend it as essential to the gospel. And we may even think that Jesus' call to sacrificial kingdom obedience is more radical and more transforming than the gospel of justification by faith alone.

I consider this message as an exegetical extension and defense of what R. C. Sproul said yesterday: "If you don't have imputation, you don't have sola fide (faith alone), and if you don't have sola fide, you don't have the gospel." My goal is to argue that Jesus preached the gospel of justification by faith alone apart from works of the law, understood as the imputation of his righteousness through faith alone.

A Word About Method

First, a word about method. One of my goals in this message is to fire you up for serious lifelong meditation on the four Gospels as they stand. I am so jealous that you not get sidetracked into peeling away the so-called layers of tradition to find the so-called historical Jesus. I want you to feel the truth and depth and wonder that awaits your lifelong labor of love in pondering the inexhaustible portraits of Jesus given us by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

1 of 9 |next | last

John Piper: Follow | Search

rating & reviews

Average User Rating:

Displaying 1–5 of 13 comments

TruService

March 28, 2013  4:41pm

Everyone please read: 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV You have to rightly divide the word. Do not mingle law with grace. We(gentiles) are under grace and free from the law.

Report Abuse

April

March 15, 2013  8:24pm

Paul states in Acts that he is to preach the same message as Christ. What was Christ's message? Read the Gospels to find out.

Report Abuse

Alex Flores

October 13, 2012  12:51pm

Jesus said "You search the (Old Testament)scriptures in search of eternal life, yet these scriptures testify about me." When I lack understanding about New Testament scripture, I look back to the Old Testament for the answer. A simple study of the Temple and its contents tell us that everything points to Jesus. There is no salvation except thru the blood of the Lamb. While there were other types of offerings (money as an example), these types of offerings were offerings of 'thanksgiving' and were not meant to alter the path of faith/grace, the only path leading into the Holy of Holies.

Report Abuse

Clifford Koehn

September 03, 2012  2:26pm

"Nothing in my hands to bring, simply to Thy Cross to clean." So often people think they have to do things to be saved.

Report Abuse

BriBrit

April 13, 2012  6:30am

How does one access Piper's article? I need to because I have just been told that Paul's "gospel of grace" must be understood by Christ's "gospel of grace" whatever is meant by that. It suggests Paul's gospel is somehow unacceptable at face value -- it doesn't mean what it says. Surely Romans 1 reveals that Paul's gospel is Christ's gospel? On the other hand I am cognisant of the fact that Christ was preaching to those still under the Law of Moses which must go part of the way to explaining why He urged compliance to the Law (cf.Matthew 5). His audience were the circumcision. Paul preached to the Gentiles, the uncircumcision. Its a complex area but it is important to clarify these issues especially in light of the rapid rise of Messianic movements with their focus on the Law of Moese as obligatory upon Christians.

Report Abuse

Review and Rate this Article: *

Low

High

1000 character limit

* Comments may be edited for tone and clarity.

related articles

Steve Mathewson

Are Jesus and Paul on the Same Page? (part one)

| How to interpret the Gospels in relation to the Epistles
Steve Mathewson

Are Jesus and Paul on the Same Page? (part two)

| When Jesus seems to preach works-righteousness
Steve Mathewson

Are Jesus and Paul on the Same Page? (part three)

| How to interpret the Gospels in relation to the Epistles

more articles ...

editor's update

Matt Woodley

Back-to-Back Home Runs

May 20, 2013

archives | read more ...