Jump directly to the content
Haddon RobinsonSee theme

preaching skill

Set Free from the Cookie Cutter

How the text can form the sermon

Average Rating:  [see ratings/reviews]

When we first learn to preach, we need to learn a form to pour our sermons into, such as a three-point, subject-completed outline. But as we mature in our preaching, we need more flexibility in our sermon forms to stay out of the rut. We need to learn to let the text form the sermon, instead of vice versa.

Genre and the form of a sermon

The first step in that direction, of course, is to fully understand the text. You can talk about exegesis, and it can sound cold. Sometimes when people think of exegesis, they think of analyzing words and phrases. But basically what you're trying to do when you exegete a text is to really understand it—understand its flow of thought, how the author is developing that thought.

So when I come to didactic literature, such as Romans or Galatians, I analyze how the thought develops because there tends to be a logical flow. I get to a parable and I can't do that. The danger is to go to an epistle and see that Paul has three moves in a particular paragraph in which I can trace that development, then move over to a parable and try to say there are three things we learn from this parable. One thing you have to say is, Couldn't Jesus have said that? Why did he tell a story when he could have just as easily said, "There are three things I want you to know about God's grace?"

Part of exegesis is to recognize that the form of literature ought to have some influence on the form of the sermon. A sermon developed from didactic literature, the literature of the epistles, will be different than a sermon developed from the parables or from the Psalms or from the narrative literature of the Old Testament, because the writers are using a different form.

For example, if I say to you, "Once upon a time," what do you expect? A story.

If I say, "Dearly beloved, we're gathered here today," what do you expect? A wedding.

Or if I say, "The party of the first part assigns to the party of the second part," what do you expect? A legal document, a contract.

If I say, "And it came to pass," what do you expect? Maybe a parable. You pick up from the Bible a certain tone.

If I say to you, "How do I love thee, let me count the ways," what do you expect? Poetry.

Notice what happens. The minute I give you those clues, you set your mind to a whole new hermeneutical development. Let me give you just one more. If I say, "There were three men: a Catholic priest, a Jewish rabbi, and a Baptist minister," what do you expect? Humor.

So if I start by saying, "Once upon a time," and I give you a story, but you respond as though you were analyzing a legal document, we're going to miss each other badly.

So, there are ground rules that immediately get established based on the form.

We see it easily with English. We all carry this hermeneutical grid around with us. So if I start out by saying, "The party of the first part owes to the party of the second part," and I'm trying to establish a legal contract, but you take it as poetry, we're going to have trouble in court.

No First PageNo Previous Page Page 1 of 5 NextLast

Haddon Robinson: Follow | Search

rating & reviews

Average User Rating:

Displaying 1–5 of 5 comments

Yolanda

December 05, 2012  9:38am

Amen, very inspiring article. My heart cry is for The Lord to cause my heart to love more deeply. Forgive more readily and to deepen my awareness of His mercy for other. We as the body has to be a safe place of healing and not condemnation.

Report Abuse

Paulson Pulikottil

January 05, 2012  1:14am

I am trained on the three-point structure, but have always questioned it. Now, I have a rational and practical explanation why this three-point neatly outlined stuff doesn't work. Thanks for the clarity!

Report Abuse

Kelly Taylor

August 30, 2011  6:44am

Great article, although I have been helped and blessed by Charles Stanley and John MacArthur Jr., they are both guilty of primarily using one sermon form; Stanley has a list of points on any and every passage and MacArthur preaches everything as if it were a New Testament epistle. It never hurts to learn how to preach from Jesus; example.

Report Abuse

Marcos Pazymino

November 16, 2010  8:32am

As a new pastor, I gained new insights by reading Dr. Robinson's article. I intend to follow his advice.

Report Abuse

Jimmy Orr

November 15, 2010  2:32pm

Although it would have made this article prohibitively long, it would have been more helpful if Dr. Robinson had given sermonic examples (or at least excerpts) of the suggestions he makes in the article.

Report Abuse

Review and Rate this Article: *

Low

High

1000 character limit

* Comments may be edited for tone and clarity.

related articles

Haddon Robinson

The Heresy of Application

| It's when we're applying Scripture that error most likely creeps in.
Dick Lucas

Preaching the Melodic Line

| How the grand themes enrich a sermon.
John Koessler

Why All the Best Preachers Are--What a Concept!--Theological (pt. 1)

| Everyone does theology. Do you do it right?

more articles ...

editor's update

Matt Woodley

Should You Preach Like a TED Talk?

August 4, 2014

archives | read more ...